State Impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025
image/svg+xml Skip to main content
Search image/svg+xml

Key Takeaways:

  • The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed by President Trump in July, introduces major changes to healthcare, tax, and spending that will significantly impact state budgets. Nearly twenty states have already published analyses of the bill's effects as they prepare for upcoming legislative sessions.
  • SNAP funding will shift dramatically starting next year, with states paying 75% of administrative costs instead of splitting them with the federal government. By 2027, states will also cover up to 15% of benefit costs based on their error rates, potentially costing hundreds of millions annually.
  • Medicaid faces the most sweeping changes since the Affordable Care Act, with federal funding cuts totaling over $792 billion over ten years. States must implement work requirements and six-month verification processes for Medicaid expansion enrollees by January 2027.
  • The timeline provides some relief for states, with only 6% of the $792 billion in Medicaid cuts hitting state budgets between 2025-2027. The most drastic federal revenue reductions won't occur until 2028, giving states time to plan for the administrative and fiscal challenges ahead.


H.R. 1, also known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), was signed into law by President Trump on July 4, 2025. The bill’s healthcare, tax, and spending priorities will have a significant impact on states. We anticipate that most states will address these changes in 2026 or beyond. 


States Analyze Impact of the OBBBA

In preparation for these discussions, nearly twenty states (primarily democratically controlled states) have published various analyses on the impacts that OBBBA will have on their state. Some of these reports are more partisan in nature, while others are more fiscally focused, but they all provide a preview of states’ priorities in upcoming sessions. 




The OBBBA Policy Changes That Will Impact States the Most

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)

Changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will have significant cost implications for states. Previously, the federal government funded all of the benefit costs and split the administrative costs with states. However, beginning next year, states will begin paying 75% of administrative costs, and, beginning in 2027, states will be responsible for a portion of the benefit costs — up to 15% depending on states’ error rates. Even without accounting for increased administrative costs, the benefit-cost shift could cost states hundreds of millions per year if states decide to continue funding the program at its current level. Although policymakers will need to address these funding questions, they have some time to consider options and funding mechanisms as these changes will take several years to phase in.

Medicaid

OBBBA marks the most sweeping change to Medicaid and coverage policy since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act. Specifically, six provisions will have the largest influence on states’ budgets by reducing federal funding by more than $792 billion over 10 years. These provisions include work requirements, provider tax rates, state-directed payments, six-month redeterminations, uniform tax waivers, and Emergency Medicaid's Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP).

The heaviest lift for states in the short term is not fiscal in nature but administrative. Beginning in January 2027, states will be required to implement and ensure Medicaid expansion enrollees comply with both work requirements and six-month verification processes. Implementing work requirements has proven to be an administratively complex process, as illustrated by experiences in Georgia and Arkansas. Simultaneously, performing six-month eligibility verification procedures is likely to require increased administrative personnel to accommodate the increased onus on agencies. An inability to invest in personnel and resources at the state level to handle the increased workflow may result in higher processing errors or churn rates, creating procedural disenrollments (i.e., enrollees lose coverage not due to eligibility but because of paperwork or administrative issues).

The loss of federal Medicaid revenue over the next ten years, if implemented as enacted, would be near impossible for individual states to make up the difference on their own. However, when the U.S. Senate passed its final version of the reconciliation bill, it also accommodated for effective dates that mitigate fiscal implications for states in 2025 and 2026. Based on the six key Medicaid provisions in the bill, states won’t realize the most drastic cuts in federal Medicaid revenue until 2028 at the earliest. Notably, between 2025 and 2027, only 6% of the $792 billion in cuts from the six largest Medicaid provisions will hit state budgets.


Get the Full Report

The MultiState team has been compiling the state-specific impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill. Nearly twenty states have published reports or directed agencies to respond, and it’s likely that more will follow. To access our state-by-state report, please reach out to us here. We will continue to update this analysis throughout the remainder of the year as more states respond to the OBBBA and its impacts.