In our previous post
, we discussed the state budget difficulties in Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and New Mexico. In part two, we'll examine Kansas, Oklahoma, and West Virginia.
Kansas' fight over tax reform
Kansas Governor Brownback's (R) marquee 2013 tax cuts continued to hang over the legislature's deliberations this year. With the state repeatedly
facing fiscal shortfalls, lawmakers have questioned the wisdom of some of these tax policies, such as exempting pass-through entities from the state's income tax (lawmakers in other states
have even begun using Kansas as an example of how not
to structure tax reform). The chorus grew particularly loud this year as the state faced a two-year revenue deficit of $900 million
and lawsuit over state education funding
that threatened to balloon that figure even further.
Opposing sides of the argument laid out their positions quickly, with Governor Brownback using his State of the State address
to warn against repealing the pass-through income exemption, only to have the legislature pass a repeal bill (KS HB 2178
) before the end of February. This was by far the most support that a repeal effort had received, but it was still not enough to overcome the governor's inevitable veto
. This left lawmakers at an impasse. There was insufficient support for repealing the Brownback tax cuts, but there was even less
support for the governor's recommendation to hike alcohol and tobacco taxes.
This stalemate persisted as legislators failed to come to consensus on state spending. On May 1, the legislature went into overtime, again passing a repeal bill (KS SB 30
) without what appeared to be enough votes to clear a second guaranteed
veto. However, repeal advocates were able to marshal a coalition of moderate Republicans and conservative Democrats to vote to override the governor
. The final vote was 27-13 in the senate and 88-31 in the house.
Lawmakers also considered non-repeal tax reform bills (including measures to expand the sales tax base
and sunset existing tax expenditures
), but these proposals failed to make any significant legislative progress.
The Oklahoma budget deal no one is satisfied with
Coming into the session, Oklahoma faced a $878 million budget deficit
, with elected leaders divided about how to close it. Governor Fallin (R) announced
in February that she would not sign off on a budget that cut deeply into the state's essential services. Instead, her preference was to expand the sales tax base to include new services
, increase the cigarette tax, and eliminate the corporate income tax. The legislature never warmed to her ideas, with Republican lawmakers particularly criticizing
her proposal to tax new services.
In mid-May, with the regular session drawing to a close, and after weeks of closed door negotiations, lawmakers still didn't have a plan to close the fiscal gap, forcing them to move into special session. Finally, after several more days of tense negotiations, lawmakers cobbled together a slate of revenue proposals to balance the state's books. This plan increases the tax on cigarettes
, partially repeals a sales tax exemption for some car purchases
, and hikes the production taxes on certain oil and gas wells
. The final budget had enough votes to become law, but almost everyone agrees that it is lacking
But there is a further snag. Under the Oklahoma constitution, revenue bills may not be approved in the final five days of session, and they must receive a three-fourths majority vote (or be subject to a vote of the people), which these bills did not. This leaves the bills open for a relatively straightforward legal challenge, should any taxpayer opt to file suit. Lawmakers have tried to defend their actions by saying that these bills do not qualify because they do not technically raise new revenue but rather eliminate exemptions. It may be up to the courts to decide, in which case the legislature may have to return for further work.
West Virginia's bicameral stalemate
The breadth of tax policy ground that the West Virginia legislature has trod this year is staggering. Faced with a $500 million budget shortfall
, Governor Justice (D) unveiled a plan
to levy a new gross receipts-based tax (fashioned after the Ohio Commercial Activity Tax
), establish a new personal income tax surcharge on high earners, increase the sales tax rate, and expand the sales tax base. Rejecting the governor's approach, the legislature considered
its own set of reforms with proposals including a fundamental reimagining of the state sales tax
, taxing professional services
, and fully repealing the corporate income tax
For all their initial boldness, as debate progressed, lawmakers amended most of these proposals' more radical aspects. This reversion toward moderation still wasn't enough for any single revenue proposal to gain majority support. With only days left
in the regular session, legislators were still at an impasse over how to balance the state's books. With no other options, legislators spent their final weekend passing a clean budget
without any significant revenue changes at all, which the governor colorfully
Moving into special session, the divisions came into stark contrast
. The senate favored a tax reform agenda that paired a personal income tax cut with an increase in the sales tax rate, while the house advocated for keeping the clean budget and raising some new revenue by expanding the sales tax to include communications services and digital goods. Governor Justice generally seems to have favored the senate approach, but he also wanted to reinvigorate a scaled-down version of his gross receipts tax proposal
to fund state infrastructure projects.
And that's essentially where the parties have been since the special session began, with no end in sight. The governor tried to help foster a deal by literally walking back and forth
between the chamber caucus rooms for days, but that has not yielded concrete results so far. Legislators have also begun their own negotiations in a conference committee
, but this also has yet to lead to any breakthroughs.