2027 Legislative Session Dates
image/svg+xml Skip to main content
Search image/svg+xml

Key Takeaways:

  • Thirty-six gubernatorial races in November 2026 feature candidates with widely varying positions on data center policy, with most supporting expansion paired with increased regulations or local control.
  • Sixteen states have at least one gubernatorial candidate calling for a temporary data center moratorium, though the scope and duration of proposed pauses vary considerably by candidate.
  • Fewer than ten candidates across all races are pledging full support for data centers without additional regulatory conditions or community oversight requirements.
  • Gubernatorial positions on data centers show few clear partisan or regional patterns, with candidates from the same party often taking opposing stances on expansion and regulation.

We’ve spent months covering gubernatorial positions on data centers, yet stances continue to change so rapidly that there’s still ground to cover. This week, we’re diving into the 36 gubernatorial races coming up in November to unpack what candidates are saying about data center policy.

As we’ve discussed, there are relatively few partisan or regional trends when it comes to data center policy. The majority of candidates want to allow data center expansion but pair expansion with either increased regulations or strong local control. Sixteen states have at least one candidate calling for a temporary moratorium, and fewer than ten candidates total are pledging full support for data centers.

Candidate Positions on Data Center Policy

We’ve made broad categorizations in the chart below based on each candidate’s public comments, but we’ve also included the source link for each stance so you can dig in if you’re interested.

State

Republican Candidate

Republican Stance

Democratic Candidate

Democratic Stance

Alabama

Tommy Tuberville

Supports

Doug Jones

Moratorium

Alaska

Treg Taylor

Supports

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins

Moratorium

Alaska

Bernadette Wilson

No stated position

Alaska

Dave Bronson

Supports

Arizona

Andy Biggs

Regulations

Katie Hobbs (inc.)

Regulations

Arkansas

Sarah Huckabee Sanders (inc.)

Regulations

Fredrick Love

Moratorium

California

Steve Hilton

Regulations

Xavier Becerra

Regulations

Colorado

Victor Marx

No stated position

Phil Weiser

Regulations

Connecticut

Ryan Fazio

Regulations

Ned Lamont (inc.)

Regulations

Florida

Byron Donalds

Regulations

David Jolly

Moratorium

Georgia

Rick Jackson

Regulations

Keisha Lance Bottoms

Moratorium

Hawaii

Gary Cordery

No stated position

Josh Green (inc.)

No stated position

Idaho

Brad Little (inc.)

Regulations

Terri Pickens

Regulations

Illinois

Darren Bailey

Regulations

JB Pritzker (inc.)

Regulations

Iowa

Zach Lahn

Regulations

Rob Sand

Regulations

Kansas

Ty Masterson

Regulations

Cindy Holscher

Moratorium

Maine

Robert Charles

Regulations

Hannah Pingree

Moratorium

Maryland

Dan Cox

Moratorium

Wes Moore (inc.)

Regulations

Massachusetts

Mike Minogue

Moratorium

Maura Healey (inc.)

Regulations

Michigan

John James

Regulations

Jocelyn Benson

Regulations

Minnesota

Lisa Demuth

Regulations

Amy Klobuchar

Regulations

Nebraska

Jim Pillen (inc.)

Regulations

Lynne Walz

Regulations

Nevada

Joe Lombardo (inc.)

Regulations

Aaron Ford

Regulations

New Hampshire

Kelly Ayotte (inc.)

Moratorium

Cinde Warmington

Moratorium

New Mexico

Gregg Hull

Regulations

Deb Haaland

Moratorium

New York

Bruce Blakeman

Supports

Kathy Hochul (inc.)

Moratorium

Ohio

Vivek Ramaswamy

Regulations

Amy Acton

Regulations

Oklahoma

Mike Mazzei

Regulations

Cyndi Munson

Regulations

Oregon

Christine Drazan

Moratorium

Tina Kotek (inc.)

Moratorium

Pennsylvania

Stacy Garrity

Moratorium

Josh Shapiro (inc.)

Regulations

Rhode Island

Race not called yet

N/A

Helena Foulkes

Regulations

South Carolina

Alan Wilson

Supports

Jermaine Johnson

Moratorium

South Dakota

Larry Rhoden (inc.)

Regulations

Dan Ahlers

Regulations

Tennessee

Marsha Blackburn

Supports

Jerri Green

Moratorium

Texas

Greg Abbott (inc.)

Moratorium

Gina Hinojosa

Moratorium

Vermont

Phil Scott (inc.)

Supports

Amanda Janoo

Regulations

Wisconsin

Tom Tiffany

Regulations

David Crowley

Regulations

Wyoming

Eric Barlow

Supports

Kenneth Casner

No stated position


To some candidates, increased regulations just means strong local control, while to others, regulations include broad legislative packages that impact everything from energy to community affairs to tax.

Additionally, support for a moratorium can have different meanings for candidates as well. Some candidates are calling for short-term moratoriums to gather more information while others are taking a stronger, more permanent position.

Either way, we expect even more changes to emerge from campaigns this fall, and for governors to be at the forefront of these policy discussions in 2027.

Track State Data Center Policy

Last year, states considered hundreds of data center bills, and we expect activity to continue growing in 2026. To stay on top of this rapidly evolving landscape, we've launched MultiState Policy Watch: Data Centers – a subscription featuring legislative analysis, trend summaries, and expert insights across energy, tax, water, zoning, and other policy areas impacting data centers. Sign up here.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which states have gubernatorial candidates calling for a data center moratorium in 2026?

At least sixteen states have one or more gubernatorial candidates calling for a temporary moratorium on data center development as of the 2026 election cycle. The specific duration and scope of these proposed moratoriums vary by candidate, with some seeking short-term pauses to gather information while others advocate for more permanent restrictions.

What is the most common gubernatorial position on data center expansion in 2026?

The majority of gubernatorial candidates support allowing data center expansion but want to pair it with either increased regulations or strong local control measures. Fewer than ten candidates across all races are pledging full support for data centers without additional conditions. This reflects a middle-ground approach that balances economic development with community concerns.

Are there clear partisan differences in gubernatorial data center policy positions?

No, there are relatively few partisan or regional trends when it comes to gubernatorial candidates' positions on data center policy. Candidates from both parties and across different regions show varied approaches, ranging from full support to moratoriums to regulated expansion. The lack of clear partisan alignment makes these races particularly unpredictable on this issue.

What types of regulations are gubernatorial candidates proposing for data centers?

Proposed regulations vary significantly by candidate, with some focusing primarily on strong local control while others advocate for comprehensive legislative packages. These broader regulatory approaches can address multiple areas including energy consumption, community impact, and tax policy. The term "increased regulations" encompasses a wide spectrum of policy interventions depending on the candidate.

When will new gubernatorial data center policies likely take effect?

Governors are expected to be at the forefront of data center policy discussions in 2027, following the November 2026 elections. Campaign positions continue to evolve rapidly in the lead-up to the election, and final policy directions will become clearer once newly elected or re-elected governors take office.