Elections & Campaigns
State Redistricting Legal Challenges Intensify Ahead of 2026 Elections
March 9, 2026 | Sandy Dornsife
Over seven months into the mid-decade redistricting 2026 cycle, four states—California, Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas—have successfully adopted new congressional maps, while Virginia, Florida, Maryland, and Washington continue to navigate their own redistricting efforts. State redistricting legal challenges have centered on whether new maps constitute permissible partisan gerrymandering or unconstitutional racial discrimination, with federal courts reaching different conclusions in Texas, California, and North Carolina cases. The Texas and California redistricting lawsuits have both reached the Supreme Court, with California's new map cleared for use after the Court denied an appeal, while Texas received a stay allowing its contested map to proceed for the November election. Congressional map gerrymandering cases across multiple states remain unresolved as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on Louisiana v. Callais, a decision that will clarify how states must balance racial gerrymandering prohibitions with efforts to prevent minority voter disenfranchisement. Several state redistricting legal challenges face tight deadlines, and Supreme Court decisions typically released in June could leave redistricting plans uncertain until just before voters head to the polls.